|
![]() |
|||
|
||||
OverviewHigh Courts and Economic Governance in Argentina and Brazil analyzes how high courts and elected leaders in Latin America interacted over neoliberal restructuring, one of the most significant socioeconomic transformations in recent decades. Courts face a critical choice when deciding cases concerning national economic policy, weighing rule of law concerns against economic imperatives. Elected leaders confront equally difficult dilemmas when courts issue decisions challenging their actions. Based on extensive fieldwork in Argentina and Brazil, this study identifies striking variation in inter-branch interactions between the two countries. In Argentina, while high courts often defer to politicians in the economic realm, inter-branch relations are punctuated by tense bouts of conflict. Brazilian courts and elected officials, by contrast, routinely accommodate one another in their decisions about economic policy. Diana Kapiszewski argues that the two high courts contrasting characters political in Argentina and statesman-like in Brazil shaped their decisions on controversial cases and conditioned how elected leaders responded to their rulings, channeling inter-branch interactions into persistent patterns. Full Product DetailsAuthor: Diana Kapiszewski (University of California, Irvine)Publisher: Not Avail Imprint: Not Avail ISBN: 9786613950727ISBN 10: 6613950726 Pages: 304 Publication Date: 31 August 2012 Audience: General/trade , General Format: Electronic book text Publisher's Status: Active Availability: Available To Order ![]() We have confirmation that this item is in stock with the supplier. It will be ordered in for you and dispatched immediately. Table of ContentsReviewsHigh Courts and Economic Governance in Argentina and Brazil is an important empirical and theoretical contribution to the burgeoning literature on judicial politics in Latin America and to the broader literature on historical institutionalism. Diana Kapiszewski shows that high courts developed identifiable, relatively stable characters that help explain the pattern of interactions between courts and elected officials. By emphasizing court character, she challenges accounts that focus exclusively on judges or politicians short-term strategic incentives. Kapiszewski also skillfully analyzes the origins of the differences in court character in Argentina and Brazil. Scott Mainwaring, Eugene and Helen Conley Professor of Political Science, University of Notre Dame Author InformationTab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |