Overview

"Americans agree about government arts funding in the way the women in the old joke agree about the food at the wedding: it's terrible - and such small portions! Americans typically either want to abolish the National Endowment for the Arts, or they believe that public arts funding should be dramatically increased because the arts cannot survive in the free market. It would take a lover of the arts who is also a libertarian economist to bridge such a gap. Enter Tyler Cowen. In this book, he argues why the U.S. way of funding the arts, while largely indirect, results not in the terrible and the small, but in Good and Plenty - and how it could result in even more and better. Few would deny that America produces and consumes art of a quantity and quality comparable to that of any country. But, is this despite or because of America's meager direct funding of the arts relative to European countries? Overturning the conventional wisdom of this question, Cowen argues that American art thrives through an ingenious combination of small direct subsidies and immense indirect subsidies, such as copyright law and tax policies that encourage nonprofits and charitable giving.This decentralized and even somewhat accidental - but decidedly not laissez-faire - system results in arts that are arguably more creative, diverse, abundant, and politically unencumbered than that of Europe. Bringing serious attention to the neglected issue of the American way of funding the arts, ""Good and Plenty"" is essential reading for anyone concerned about the arts or their funding."

Full Product Details

9780691120423

Table of Contents

Reviews

A rare and much needed objective look at the topic of government funding for the arts. Avoiding the hyperbole often heard on both sides of the argument, Cowen offers a balanced overview of publicly-funded art. A must for the biased advocate. -- Art Times Cowen makes the point loudly and clearly: indirect subsidy favors the decentralization of artistic creativity, particularly as it involves nonprofit institutions, and a thousand flowers can (and do) bloom. -- J. Mark Schuster, Journal of Cultural Economics [Good and Plenty] explores the debate over government funding for the arts in an attempt to make each position intelligible and sympathetic to the other side. -- Journal of Economic Literature Where Good and Plenty is at its best is in its discussion of the overall ecology of the arts and cultural sector, drawing explicit links between avant-garde activity and later commercial success. The narrative of experimentation as research and development for the sector is one that has recently gained currency in the UK and is discussed with persuasive force in Cowen's book. -- Dave O'Brien, LSE British Politics and Policy blog

A rare and much needed objective look at the topic of government funding for the arts. Avoiding the hyperbole often heard on both sides of the argument, Cowen offers a balanced overview of publicly-funded art. A must for the biased advocate. Art Times Cowen makes the point loudly and clearly: indirect subsidy favors the decentralization of artistic creativity, particularly as it involves nonprofit institutions, and a thousand flowers can (and do) bloom. -- J. Mark Schuster Journal of Cultural Economics [Good and Plenty] explores the debate over government funding for the arts in an attempt to make each position intelligible and sympathetic to the other side. Journal of Economic Literature

Author Information

"Tyler Cowen is the author of many books, including ""Creative Destruction: How Globalization is Changing the World's Cultures"" (Princeton) and ""In Praise of Commercial Culture"". He is Holbert C. Harris Chair of Economics at George Mason University."

Tab Content 6

Customer Reviews

Recent Reviews

Countries Available