Free Press v. Fair Trial: Supreme Court Decisions Since 1807

Author:   Douglas S. Campbell
Publisher:   Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
ISBN:  

9780275942779


Pages:   264
Publication Date:   21 September 1993
Recommended Age:   From 7 to 17 years
Format:   Hardback
Availability:   Manufactured on demand   Availability explained
We will order this item for you from a manufactured on demand supplier.

Our Price $140.00 Quantity:  
Add to Cart

Share |

Free Press v. Fair Trial: Supreme Court Decisions Since 1807


Add your own review!

Overview

This volume takes a historical approach in analyzing all of the major United States Supreme Court cases relevant to the conflict between a free press and fair trial. Campbell's thorough analysis, which relates 30 primary cases to each other and to nearly 70 associated supporting cases, consists of five parts: (1) legal backgrounds; (2) immediate historical circumstances giving rise to the cases; (3) complete summaries of all court opinions, concurring opinions, and dissenting opinions, often using the Justices' own words; (4) the Court's ruling; and (5) analysis of the significance of the cases.

Full Product Details

Author:   Douglas S. Campbell
Publisher:   Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
Imprint:   Praeger Publishers Inc
Dimensions:   Width: 15.20cm , Height: 1.90cm , Length: 22.90cm
Weight:   0.559kg
ISBN:  

9780275942779


ISBN 10:   0275942775
Pages:   264
Publication Date:   21 September 1993
Recommended Age:   From 7 to 17 years
Audience:   College/higher education ,  Professional and scholarly ,  Undergraduate ,  Postgraduate, Research & Scholarly
Format:   Hardback
Publisher's Status:   Active
Availability:   Manufactured on demand   Availability explained
We will order this item for you from a manufactured on demand supplier.

Table of Contents

Primary Cases Listed Alphabetically by Full Title Introduction Primary Cases Aaron Burr v. U.S. (1807) Reid v. U.S. (1851) Reynolds v. U.S. (1878) Hopt v. Utah (1887) Spies v. Illinois (1887) Simmons v. U.S. (1891) Mattox v. U.S. (1892) Thiede v. Utah (1895) Holt v. U.S. (1910) Stroud v. U.S. (1919) Shepherd v. Florida (1951) Stroble v. California (1952) U.S. ex rel Darcy v. Handy (1956) Marshall v. U.S. (1959) Irvin v. Dowd (1961) Beck v. Washington (1962) Rideau v. Louisiana (1963) Estes v. Texas (1965) Sheppard v. Maxwell (1966) Murphy v. Florida (1975) Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart (1976) Gannett v. DePasquale (1979) Richmond Newspapers v. Virginia (1980) Chandler v. Florida (1981) Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court (1982) Press Enterprise Co. v. Riverside (1984) Waller v. Georgia (1984) Patton v. Yount (1984) Press Enterprise v. Riverside (1986) Mu'Min v. Virginia (1991) Supporting Cases Selected Bibliography Index

Reviews

The careful and detailed treatment of 30 cases, especially the less well-known historical cases, makes this book a useful resource for any journalism library or journalism professor. It also could serve as a text for a graduate history or law seminar about the issues of free press and fair trial. Portions of the book could supplement a communications law class or help students on research papers. - Source Unknown ... a concise, easily accessible legal reference on the Supreme Court's fair trial/free press decisions....The real value of the work, however, is the way a condensed reading of the leading cases can illuminate what may in fact be so obvious as to be overlooked. -Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly ?The careful and detailed treatment of 30 cases, especially the less well-known historical cases, makes this book a useful resource for any journalism library or journalism professor. It also could serve as a text for a graduate history or law seminar about the issues of free press and fair trial. Portions of the book could supplement a communications law class or help students on research papers.?- Source Unknown ?...a concise, easily accessible legal reference on the Supreme Court's fair trial/free press decisions....The real value of the work, however, is the way a condensed reading of the leading cases can illuminate what may in fact be so obvious as to be overlooked.?-Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly .,. a concise, easily accessible legal reference on the Supreme Court's fair trial/free press decisions....The real value of the work, however, is the way a condensed reading of the leading cases can illuminate what may in fact be so obvious as to be overlooked. -Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly


.,. a concise, easily accessible legal reference on the Supreme Court's fair trial/free press decisions....The real value of the work, however, is the way a condensed reading of the leading cases can illuminate what may in fact be so obvious as to be overlooked. -Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly


.,.""a concise, easily accessible legal reference on the Supreme Court's fair trial/free press decisions....The real value of the work, however, is the way a condensed reading of the leading cases can illuminate what may in fact be so obvious as to be overlooked.""-Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly ?...a concise, easily accessible legal reference on the Supreme Court's fair trial/free press decisions....The real value of the work, however, is the way a condensed reading of the leading cases can illuminate what may in fact be so obvious as to be overlooked.?-Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly ?The careful and detailed treatment of 30 cases, especially the less well-known historical cases, makes this book a useful resource for any journalism library or journalism professor. It also could serve as a text for a graduate history or law seminar about the issues of free press and fair trial. Portions of the book could supplement a communications law class or help students on research papers.?- Source Unknown ...""a concise, easily accessible legal reference on the Supreme Court's fair trial/free press decisions....The real value of the work, however, is the way a condensed reading of the leading cases can illuminate what may in fact be so obvious as to be overlooked.""-Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly ""The careful and detailed treatment of 30 cases, especially the less well-known historical cases, makes this book a useful resource for any journalism library or journalism professor. It also could serve as a text for a graduate history or law seminar about the issues of free press and fair trial. Portions of the book could supplement a communications law class or help students on research papers.""- Source Unknown


Author Information

DOUGLAS S. CAMPBELL is Chair of the Department of English, Journalism, and Philosophy at Lock Haven University in Pennsylvania. He is a member of the Law Division of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, and the author of The Supreme Court and the Mass Media (Praeger, 1990).

Tab Content 6

Author Website:  

Customer Reviews

Recent Reviews

No review item found!

Add your own review!

Countries Available

All regions
Latest Reading Guide

MRG2025CC

 

Shopping Cart
Your cart is empty
Shopping cart
Mailing List