|
![]() |
|||
|
||||
OverviewThis volume takes a historical approach in analyzing all of the major United States Supreme Court cases relevant to the conflict between a free press and fair trial. Campbell's thorough analysis, which relates 30 primary cases to each other and to nearly 70 associated supporting cases, consists of five parts: (1) legal backgrounds; (2) immediate historical circumstances giving rise to the cases; (3) complete summaries of all court opinions, concurring opinions, and dissenting opinions, often using the Justices' own words; (4) the Court's ruling; and (5) analysis of the significance of the cases. Full Product DetailsAuthor: Douglas S. CampbellPublisher: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc Imprint: Praeger Publishers Inc Dimensions: Width: 15.20cm , Height: 1.90cm , Length: 22.90cm Weight: 0.559kg ISBN: 9780275942779ISBN 10: 0275942775 Pages: 264 Publication Date: 21 September 1993 Recommended Age: From 7 to 17 years Audience: College/higher education , Professional and scholarly , Undergraduate , Postgraduate, Research & Scholarly Format: Hardback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: Manufactured on demand ![]() We will order this item for you from a manufactured on demand supplier. Table of ContentsPrimary Cases Listed Alphabetically by Full Title Introduction Primary Cases Aaron Burr v. U.S. (1807) Reid v. U.S. (1851) Reynolds v. U.S. (1878) Hopt v. Utah (1887) Spies v. Illinois (1887) Simmons v. U.S. (1891) Mattox v. U.S. (1892) Thiede v. Utah (1895) Holt v. U.S. (1910) Stroud v. U.S. (1919) Shepherd v. Florida (1951) Stroble v. California (1952) U.S. ex rel Darcy v. Handy (1956) Marshall v. U.S. (1959) Irvin v. Dowd (1961) Beck v. Washington (1962) Rideau v. Louisiana (1963) Estes v. Texas (1965) Sheppard v. Maxwell (1966) Murphy v. Florida (1975) Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart (1976) Gannett v. DePasquale (1979) Richmond Newspapers v. Virginia (1980) Chandler v. Florida (1981) Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court (1982) Press Enterprise Co. v. Riverside (1984) Waller v. Georgia (1984) Patton v. Yount (1984) Press Enterprise v. Riverside (1986) Mu'Min v. Virginia (1991) Supporting Cases Selected Bibliography IndexReviewsThe careful and detailed treatment of 30 cases, especially the less well-known historical cases, makes this book a useful resource for any journalism library or journalism professor. It also could serve as a text for a graduate history or law seminar about the issues of free press and fair trial. Portions of the book could supplement a communications law class or help students on research papers. - Source Unknown ... a concise, easily accessible legal reference on the Supreme Court's fair trial/free press decisions....The real value of the work, however, is the way a condensed reading of the leading cases can illuminate what may in fact be so obvious as to be overlooked. -Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly ?The careful and detailed treatment of 30 cases, especially the less well-known historical cases, makes this book a useful resource for any journalism library or journalism professor. It also could serve as a text for a graduate history or law seminar about the issues of free press and fair trial. Portions of the book could supplement a communications law class or help students on research papers.?- Source Unknown ?...a concise, easily accessible legal reference on the Supreme Court's fair trial/free press decisions....The real value of the work, however, is the way a condensed reading of the leading cases can illuminate what may in fact be so obvious as to be overlooked.?-Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly .,. a concise, easily accessible legal reference on the Supreme Court's fair trial/free press decisions....The real value of the work, however, is the way a condensed reading of the leading cases can illuminate what may in fact be so obvious as to be overlooked. -Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly .,. a concise, easily accessible legal reference on the Supreme Court's fair trial/free press decisions....The real value of the work, however, is the way a condensed reading of the leading cases can illuminate what may in fact be so obvious as to be overlooked. -Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly .,.""a concise, easily accessible legal reference on the Supreme Court's fair trial/free press decisions....The real value of the work, however, is the way a condensed reading of the leading cases can illuminate what may in fact be so obvious as to be overlooked.""-Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly ?...a concise, easily accessible legal reference on the Supreme Court's fair trial/free press decisions....The real value of the work, however, is the way a condensed reading of the leading cases can illuminate what may in fact be so obvious as to be overlooked.?-Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly ?The careful and detailed treatment of 30 cases, especially the less well-known historical cases, makes this book a useful resource for any journalism library or journalism professor. It also could serve as a text for a graduate history or law seminar about the issues of free press and fair trial. Portions of the book could supplement a communications law class or help students on research papers.?- Source Unknown ...""a concise, easily accessible legal reference on the Supreme Court's fair trial/free press decisions....The real value of the work, however, is the way a condensed reading of the leading cases can illuminate what may in fact be so obvious as to be overlooked.""-Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly ""The careful and detailed treatment of 30 cases, especially the less well-known historical cases, makes this book a useful resource for any journalism library or journalism professor. It also could serve as a text for a graduate history or law seminar about the issues of free press and fair trial. Portions of the book could supplement a communications law class or help students on research papers.""- Source Unknown Author InformationDOUGLAS S. CAMPBELL is Chair of the Department of English, Journalism, and Philosophy at Lock Haven University in Pennsylvania. He is a member of the Law Division of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, and the author of The Supreme Court and the Mass Media (Praeger, 1990). Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |