Overview

Forensic Meta-Evaluation: A Perspective from Forensic Psychiatry offers a comprehensive framework for critically analyzing forensic expert reports. Drawing from clinical rigor, ethical principles, and legal standards, the book equips readers with tools to identify methodological flaws, assess reasoning quality, and distinguish between competent and deficient evaluations. Through detailed guidance on structure, validity, bias mitigation, and professional responsibility, it transforms abstract standards into practical criteria for real-world scrutiny. Importance for the Profession This book is a landmark contribution to the forensic field, addressing a long-standing gap in quality control. It challenges the profession to move beyond credentialism and rhetorical authority toward evidence-based accountability. For forensic psychiatrists, psychologists, attorneys, and judges, it provides a shared language for evaluating expert testimony with precision and fairness. It also introduces meta-evaluation as a distinct subspecialty, advocating for its integration into training, certification, and judicial practice. Impact and Vision The book's impact lies in its unapologetic call for reform and its constructive roadmap for elevating standards. It reframes critique as a professional duty, not a personal attack, and positions meta-evaluation as a mechanism of justice, integrity, and scientific maturity. By combining technical depth with ethical clarity, it inspires a new generation of experts to embrace humility, rigor, and courage. If widely adopted, its principles could reshape how forensic evidence is produced, reviewed, and trusted in courts worldwide.

Full Product Details

9798242571693

Table of Contents

Reviews

Author Information

Tab Content 6

Countries Available