|
![]() |
|||
|
||||
OverviewThe case-law of the European Court of Human Rights on discrimination under the Convention is typically considered to be unclear and conflicting. Against that background, new possibilities for more effective protection against discrimination are opening up through developments in the case-law on Article 14 and with the advent of Protocol 12 to the Convention. This study demonstrates that the ""objective and reasonable justification"" test and conventional treatment of non-discrimination are not apt for dealing with these emerging new possibilities or for explaining the variations in existing case-law. It therefore suggests a new approach to dealing with protection against discrimination under the Convention, developed by focusing on variations in the strictness of objective justification review. This study proposes a more viable framework for understanding discrimination analysis under the Convention which includes an alternative interpretation of the burden of proof under Article 14 and a three-tiered model of factors that influence the strictness of review. Full Product DetailsAuthor: Oddný Mjöll ArnadóttirPublisher: Kluwer Law International Imprint: Kluwer Law International Volume: 74 Dimensions: Width: 15.50cm , Height: 2.00cm , Length: 23.50cm Weight: 0.590kg ISBN: 9789041119124ISBN 10: 9041119124 Pages: 272 Publication Date: 01 December 2002 Audience: College/higher education , Professional and scholarly , Undergraduate , Postgraduate, Research & Scholarly Format: Hardback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: Available To Order ![]() We have confirmation that this item is in stock with the supplier. It will be ordered in for you and dispatched immediately. Table of Contents1. Introduction. 2. Substantive Equality. 3. Protection against Discrimination under the European Convention on Human Rights. 4. Strictness of Review and the Burden of Proof. 5. Strictness of Review and the Influencing Factors. 6. Strictness of Review and the Necessity of Review. 7. Conclusions. Table 1. Table 2. Table 3. Table 4. Judgments Referred to in the Study. Bibliography. Index.ReviewsAuthor InformationOddný Mjöll Arnadóttir is a practising advocate and an independent scholar in Iceland. Since 1994 she has practised law, taught at university level and has been involved in various research projects. Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |