Overview

How do armies fight and what makes them victorious on the modern battlefield? In Divided Armies, Jason Lyall challenges long-standing answers to this classic question by linking the fate of armies to their levels of inequality. Introducing the concept of military inequality, Lyall demonstrates how a state's prewar choices about the citizenship status of ethnic groups within its population determine subsequent battlefield performance. Treating certain ethnic groups as second-class citizens, either by subjecting them to state-sanctioned discrimination or, worse, violence, undermines interethnic trust, fuels grievances, and leads victimized soldiers to subvert military authorities once war begins. The higher an army's inequality, Lyall finds, the greater its rates of desertion, side-switching, casualties, and use of coercion to force soldiers to fight.In a sweeping historical investigation, Lyall draws on Project Mars, a new dataset of 250 conventional wars fought since 1800, to test this argument. Project Mars breaks with prior efforts by including overlooked non-Western wars while cataloguing new patterns of inequality and wartime conduct across hundreds of belligerents. Combining historical comparisons and statistical analysis, Lyall also marshals evidence from nine wars, ranging from the Eastern Fronts of World Wars I and II to less familiar wars in Africa and Central Asia, to illustrate inequality's effects.Sounding the alarm on the dangers of inequality for battlefield performance, Divided Armies offers important lessons about warfare over the past two centuries-and for wars still to come.

Full Product Details

9780691192437

Table of Contents

Reviews

An inviting and challenging read, one that necessitates and rewards thoughtful investment. ---Dr. Larry D. Miller, National Defense University Press A welcome mingling of the traditions of quantitative and qualitative political science. He sets a rigorous and imaginative methodological standard that others will struggle to match. ---Lawrence D. Freedman, Foreign Affairs An extraordinary achievement, providing new ideas about the non-material determinants of battlefield performance, and presenting compelling quantitative and qualitative evidence. It will no doubt shape research agendas on war for many years to come. * Journal of Peace Research * 2019 War on the Rocks Holiday Reading List

Based on assiduous archival, autobiographical, and historiographic research along with a newly created comprehensive dataset of all conventionally fought wars since 1800, this brilliant page-turner will delight aficionados of military history and open new paths for experts seeking to uncover the correlates of warfare. Lyall's simple but powerful thesis-ethnic discrimination among units comprising a belligerent army leads to battlefield failure-is original and compelling. -David D. Laitin, Stanford University In Divided Armies, Lyall's argument about the link between military inequality and military effectiveness is smart and novel. The data gathering is extremely impressive, as is the care given to the qualitative and quantitative assessments. I highly recommend it. -Michael C. Horowitz, University of Pennsylvania Lyall's important work arrays data from 250 wars since 1800 to prove systematically what Washington, Grant, and Eisenhower described: that the political compact between a country and its fighting forces is a major determinant in warfare. This beautifully written book brilliantly blends quantitative and qualitative methods to show that what states choose to do about status and belonging-about political identity-before wars decisively affects their forces' ability to persevere in combat. -Kori Schake, International Institute for Strategic Studies Ambitious in scope, Divided Armies offers a new theory for an important subject: battlefield military effectiveness in conventional wars from the 1800s to the present. Marshaling an impressive array of empirical evidence to support his arguments, Lyall addresses a topic that will interest policymakers, scholars, and readers from a variety of disciplines. -Jasen J. Castillo, Texas A&M University Inequality can prove dangerous for the battlefield fate of armies. Lyall, in this smart and timely book, warns us all that the divisions within a community are reflected in the divisions within the armies that represent them-with devastating costs. A critical read for policymakers and scholars alike. -General (Ret.) Stanley McChrystal

2019 War on the Rocks Holiday Reading List

Perhaps the most thorough look at how cohesion has made some armies and fighting forces stronger than others . . . . I view this more as a cohesion story than an 'inequality' story (current U.S. forces seem pretty sharp) . . . . A good integration of military history with modern social science. ---Tyler Cowen, Marginal Revolution

2019 War on the Rocks Holiday Reading List Perhaps the most thorough look at how cohesion has made some armies and fighting forces stronger than others . . . . I view this more as a cohesion story than an 'inequality' story (current U.S. forces seem pretty sharp) . . . . A good integration of military history with modern social science. ---Tyler Cowen, Marginal Revolution A data-driven political science exploration of what makes for war-winning armies. Much military analysis of unit cohesion argues against diversity, and Lyall shows the counter case: that political and social inclusiveness is the dominant factor in willingness to fight. ---Kori Schake, War on the Rocks

Ambitious in scope, Divided Armies offers a new theory for an important subject: battlefield military effectiveness in conventional wars from the 1800s to the present. Marshaling an impressive array of empirical evidence to support his arguments, Lyall addresses a topic that will interest policymakers, scholars, and readers from a variety of disciplines. -Jasen J. Castillo, Texas A&M University In Divided Armies, Lyall's argument about the link between military inequality and military effectiveness is smart and novel. The data gathering is extremely impressive, as is the care given to the qualitative and quantitative assessments. I highly recommend it. -Michael C. Horowitz, University of Pennsylvania Inequality can prove dangerous for the battlefield fate of armies. Lyall, in this smart and timely book, warns us all that the divisions within a community are reflected in the divisions within the armies that represent them-with devastating costs. A critical read for policymakers and scholars alike. -General (Ret.) Stanley McChrystal Based on assiduous archival, autobiographical, and historiographic research along with a newly created comprehensive dataset of all conventionally fought wars since 1800, this brilliant page-turner will delight aficionados of military history and open new paths for experts seeking to uncover the correlates of warfare. Lyall's simple but powerful thesis-ethnic discrimination among units comprising a belligerent army leads to battlefield failure-is original and compelling. -David D. Laitin, Stanford University Lyall's important work arrays data from 250 wars since 1800 to prove systematically what Washington, Grant, and Eisenhower described: that the political compact between a country and its fighting forces is a major determinant in warfare. This beautifully written book brilliantly blends quantitative and qualitative methods to show that what states choose to do about status and belonging-about political identity-before wars decisively affects their forces' ability to persevere in combat. -Kori Schake, International Institute for Strategic Studies

Author Information

Jason Lyall is the James Wright Associate Professor in Transnational Studies and associate professor of government at Dartmouth College, where he also directs the Political Violence FieldLab.

Tab Content 6

Customer Reviews

Recent Reviews

Countries Available