Overview

America is the first society in history to make ethno-racial diversity an affirmative social ideal rather than viewing it as a fearful menace, as almost all other societies still do. Since the 1960s, America has pursued this ideal in many forms - not only to remedy past discrimination against minorities but also to increase diversity for its own sake. It is high time for an accounting. How diverse are we now and what can we expect in the future? Why do we, unlike the rest of the world, think that diversity is desirable and that more of it is better? What risks does diversity pose? What are the roles of law, politics and informal social controls in promoting diversity? How can we manage diversity better? In this book, Peter H. Schuck explains how Americans have understood diversity, how we came to embrace it, how the government regulates it now, and how we can do better. He mobilizes a wealth of conceptual, historical, legal, political and sociological analysis to argue that diversity is best managed not by the government but by families, ethnic groups, religious communities, employers, voluntary organizations and other civil society institutions. Analyzing some of the most controversial policy arenas where politics and diversity intersect - immigration, multiculturalism, language, affirmative action, residential neighbourhoods, religious practices, faith-based social services, and school choice - Schuck reveals the conflicts, trade-offs, and ironies entailed by our commitment to the diversity ideal. He concludes with recommendations to help us manage the challenge of diversity in the future.

Full Product Details

9780674010536

Table of Contents

Reviews

A thorough examination of the idea of diversity, including its use as a justification for affirmative action policies, this book expresses skepticism concerning the competence of government to manage diversity...""Diversity in America"" adds breadth to standard debates abut affirmative action It does so by considering not only diversity in higher education, but also the ethnic and cultural diversity fueled by immigration, the racial and social diversity often frustrated by patterns of residential housing, and the religious diversity implicated in the United States' pursuit of free exercise of religion...[H]e ultimately advances a nuanced proposal that would permit certain private institutions...to engage in affirmative action practices, while prohibiting public institutions and agencies from doing so...Accordingly, the management of diversity will remain an important public issue and ""Diversity in America"" an important contribution to the United States' discourse about that issue.--Timot Schuck...sees diversity as a tremendous natural resource for American civic life. But through laws that restrict economic freedom and institutions that squelch energetic public discourse, he thinks the government has turned this great asset into a liability. Teachers and students can't always say what they want when they want because of constitutional restraints of religious speech in school, liability to lawsuits on a range of discrimination issues and the general timidity that has followed...The connections he makes between the familiar and the unexpected, and among left, right and center, make ""Diversity in America"" remarkably original.--Peter Temes""New York Times"" (04/13/2003) Some will dismiss ""Diversity in America"" as a footnote-laden apologia for the conservative cause garbed in full Establishment regalia...but Schuck isn't Chavez or Connerly, and his arguments need to be engaged. It's essential to begin thinking beyond the model of a generation ago, which assumes that the force of law rather than an appeal to what Schuck calls ""genuineness"" is the best way to manage diversity...Still, as ""Diversity in America"" acknowledges, it's hardly ""Kumbaya"" by the campfire. Our embrace of differentness is a wary, contextual and complex matter...Schuck's analyses are provocative and complex.--David L. Kirp (04/21/2003) issues and the general timidity that has followed...The connections he makes between the familiar and the unexpected, and among left, right and center, make ""Diversity in America"" remarkably original. management of diversity will remain an important public issue and ""Diversity in America"" an important contribution to the United States' discourse about that issue.

A thorough examination of the idea of diversity, including its use as a justification for affirmative action policies, this book expresses skepticism concerning the competence of government to manage diversity... Diversity in America adds breadth to standard debates abut affirmative action It does so by considering not only diversity in higher education, but also the ethnic and cultural diversity fueled by immigration, the racial and social diversity often frustrated by patterns of residential housing, and the religious diversity implicated in the United States' pursuit of free exercise of religion...[H]e ultimately advances a nuanced proposal that would permit certain private institutions...to engage in affirmative action practices, while prohibiting public institutions and agencies from doing so...Accordingly, the management of diversity will remain an important public issue and Diversity in America an important contribution to the United States' discourse about that issue. -- Timothy L. Hall Magill's Literary Annual (06/01/2004)

A thorough examination of the idea of diversity, including its use as a justification for affirmative action policies, this book expresses skepticism concerning the competence of government to manage diversity... Diversity in America adds breadth to standard debates abut affirmative action It does so by considering not only diversity in higher education, but also the ethnic and cultural diversity fueled by immigration, the racial and social diversity often frustrated by patterns of residential housing, and the religious diversity implicated in the United States' pursuit of free exercise of religion...[H]e ultimately advances a nuanced proposal that would permit certain private institutions...to engage in affirmative action practices, while prohibiting public institutions and agencies from doing so...Accordingly, the management of diversity will remain an important public issue and Diversity in America an important contribution to the United States' discourse about that issue.--Timot

Author Information

PETER H. SCHUCK is Simeon E. Baldwin Professor of Law, Yale University.

Tab Content 6

Countries Available