|
|
|||
|
||||
OverviewProfessor Kegel comments on arecent decision of the German Supreme Court (""Bundesgerichtshof"" which is the court of last resort in Western Ger- many for civil and criminal actions). The court's decision dealt with an action brought by a Chicago (Illinois) manufacturer for the price of choco- late sold and delivered to the defendant in early 1954, the defendant then doing business in New Orleans (Louisiana). The greater portion of the price of $ 5. 000 had not been paid by the defendant. The action had been brought before a German court because the defendant had assets in Germany. The issue of the case was whether or not the statute of limitations had run. The German Supreme Court in its decision restated the rule of German conflicts law that the law governing the limitation of an action is the law which governs the obligation. The Court held that, as an action for price is governed by the lex loci solutionis, the law of Louisiana had to be applied in the case before the court. The Court, however, pointed out that should the law of Louisiana subject the duties of the buyer to another law - in the case at bar to the law of Illinois - this reference of Louisiana law to Illinois law would be binding on German courts. Full Product DetailsAuthor: Gerhard KegelPublisher: Springer-Verlag Berlin and Heidelberg GmbH & Co. KG Imprint: Springer-Verlag Edition: 1962 ed. Volume: 103 Dimensions: Width: 17.00cm , Height: 0.50cm , Length: 24.40cm Weight: 0.166kg ISBN: 9783322981325ISBN 10: 3322981320 Pages: 80 Publication Date: 01 January 1962 Audience: Professional and scholarly , Professional & Vocational Format: Paperback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: In Print This item will be ordered in for you from one of our suppliers. Upon receipt, we will promptly dispatch it out to you. For in store availability, please contact us. Language: German Table of ContentsI. Fall.- II. Materielles Verjährungsrecht.- 1. Deutschland.- 2. USA.- 3. Ergebnis.- III. Internationales Verjährungsrecht.- 1. Deutschland.- 2. USA.- IV. Qualifikation.- 1. Problem.- 2. Lösungen.- 3. Ergebnis.- V. Renvoi.- 1. Problem.- 2. Allgmeine Lösung.- 3. Verjährung.- VI. Gesamtergebnis.- Summary / Résumé.- Diskussion.ReviewsAuthor InformationTab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |
||||