|
![]() |
|||
|
||||
OverviewFull Product DetailsAuthor: Hugo Bowles (Professor of English, Associate Professor of English language and linguistics, University of Rome Tor Vergata)Publisher: Oxford University Press Imprint: Oxford University Press Dimensions: Width: 16.40cm , Height: 1.90cm , Length: 24.20cm Weight: 0.552kg ISBN: 9780198829072ISBN 10: 0198829078 Pages: 214 Publication Date: 30 January 2019 Audience: Professional and scholarly , Professional & Vocational Format: Hardback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: To order ![]() Stock availability from the supplier is unknown. We will order it for you and ship this item to you once it is received by us. Table of ContentsReviewsA very original and in many places ground-breaking piece of research; it explores an area of Dickens's professional life that has often been either ignored or skirted around, offering a series of well-grounded suggestions as to the areas and extent of impact of the 'stenographic mind' on Dickens's methods of composition and creativity with language. * John Drew, Professor of English Literature, University of Buckingham * This work breaks new ground both about Dickens's life and his works insofar as his acquiring an understanding and practice of shorthand writing is concerned. It illuminates many passages in Dickens's writing that have gone unnoticed, and supplies a fresh and complete analysis of David Copperfield's recorded struggle to master the practice. It is well written - necessarily dense in explicating Gurney's system, clear and persuasive in expounding its implications about hearing, speaking, and reading as well as writing. * Robert L. Patten, Senior Research Scholar, Institute of English Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London * Dickens and the Stenographic Mind makes a significant contribution to Dickens scholarship. While it proves a fairly technical and challenging book to read, it illuminates an aspect of Dickens's life that hasn't been considered in nearly enough detail ... Bowles generously invites us to use his research to illuminate the novelist's work more fully - an invitation we would be wise to accept, with thanks. * Lillian Nayder, Dickens Quarterly * succeed[s] in debunking a criticism often levelled at Dickens studies: that there is nothing new to say. On the contrary, by asking that we engage with Dickens's works with a view to stenographic inspiration and material afterlives, these studies both offer fresh approaches and reveal just how much work remains to be done. * Katie Holdway, Victorian Periodicals Review * This work breaks new ground both about Dickens's life and his works insofar as his acquiring an understanding and practice of shorthand writing is concerned. It illuminates many passages in Dickens's writing that have gone unnoticed, and supplies a fresh and complete analysis of David Copperfield's recorded struggle to master the practice. It is well written - necessarily dense in explicating Gurney's system, clear and persuasive in expounding its implications about hearing, speaking, and reading as well as writing. * Robert L. Patten, Senior Research Scholar, Institute of English Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London * A very original and in many places ground-breaking piece of research; it explores an area of Dickens's professional life that has often been either ignored or skirted around, offering a series of well-grounded suggestions as to the areas and extent of impact of the 'stenographic mind' on Dickens's methods of composition and creativity with language. * John Drew, Professor of English Literature, University of Buckingham * This exciting suggestion is one that I hope Bowles will pursue on a larger scale in a later work. * John Glavin, Georgetown University, VICTORIAN STUDIES * Dickens and the Stenographic Mind makes a significant contribution to Dickens scholarship. While it proves a fairly technical and challenging book to read, it illuminates an aspect of Dickens's life that hasn't been considered in nearly enough detail ... Bowles generously invites us to use his research to illuminate the novelist's work more fully — an invitation we would be wise to accept, with thanks. * Lillian Nayder, Dickens Quarterly * succeed[s] in debunking a criticism often levelled at Dickens studies: that there is nothing new to say. On the contrary, by asking that we engage with Dickens's works with a view to stenographic inspiration and material afterlives, these studies both offer fresh approaches and reveal just how much work remains to be done. * Katie Holdway, Victorian Periodicals Review * This work breaks new ground both about Dickens's life and his works insofar as his acquiring an understanding and practice of shorthand writing is concerned. It illuminates many passages in Dickens's writing that have gone unnoticed, and supplies a fresh and complete analysis of David Copperfield's recorded struggle to master the practice. It is well written - necessarily dense in explicating Gurney's system, clear and persuasive in expounding its implications about hearing, speaking, and reading as well as writing. * Robert L. Patten, Senior Research Scholar, Institute of English Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London * A very original and in many places ground-breaking piece of research; it explores an area of Dickens's professional life that has often been either ignored or skirted around, offering a series of well-grounded suggestions as to the areas and extent of impact of the 'stenographic mind' on Dickens's methods of composition and creativity with language. * John Drew, Professor of English Literature, University of Buckingham * A very original and in many places ground-breaking piece of research; it explores an area of Dickens's professional life that has often been either ignored or skirted around, offering a series of well-grounded suggestions as to the areas and extent of impact of the 'stenographic mind' on Dickens's methods of composition and creativity with language. * John Drew, Professor of English Literature, University of Buckingham * This work breaks new ground both about Dickens's life and his works insofar as his acquiring an understanding and practice of shorthand writing is concerned. It illuminates many passages in Dickens's writing that have gone unnoticed, and supplies a fresh and complete analysis of David Copperfield's recorded struggle to master the practice. It is well written - necessarily dense in explicating Gurney's system, clear and persuasive in expounding its implications about hearing, speaking, and reading as well as writing. * Robert L. Patten, Senior Research Scholar, Institute of English Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London * succeed[s] in debunking a criticism often levelled at Dickens studies: that there is nothing new to say. On the contrary, by asking that we engage with Dickens's works with a view to stenographic inspiration and material afterlives, these studies both offer fresh approaches and reveal just how much work remains to be done. * Katie Holdway, Victorian Periodicals Review * Dickens and the Stenographic Mind makes a significant contribution to Dickens scholarship. While it proves a fairly technical and challenging book to read, it illuminates an aspect of Dickens's life that hasn't been considered in nearly enough detail ... Bowles generously invites us to use his research to illuminate the novelist's work more fully - an invitation we would be wise to accept, with thanks. * Lillian Nayder, Dickens Quarterly * Author InformationHugo Bowles is professor of English at the University of Foggia in southern Italy and publishes in applied linguistics and language education. His recent work focuses on stylistics and linguistic approaches to literature and his monograph Storytelling and Drama: Exploring narrative episodes in plays, published by John Benjamin in 2010, was awarded the 2012 Book Prize for Linguistics by the European Society for the Study of English (ESSE). Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |