Debating Tudor Policy in Sixteenth-Century Ireland: 'Reform' Treatises and Political Discourse

Author:   David Heffernan
Publisher:   Manchester University Press
ISBN:  

9781526118165


Pages:   272
Publication Date:   14 March 2018
Format:   Hardback
Availability:   Manufactured on demand   Availability explained
We will order this item for you from a manufactured on demand supplier.

Our Price $200.00 Quantity:  
Add to Cart

Share |

Debating Tudor Policy in Sixteenth-Century Ireland: 'Reform' Treatises and Political Discourse


Overview

Full Product Details

Author:   David Heffernan
Publisher:   Manchester University Press
Imprint:   Manchester University Press
Dimensions:   Width: 15.60cm , Height: 1.90cm , Length: 23.40cm
Weight:   0.599kg
ISBN:  

9781526118165


ISBN 10:   1526118165
Pages:   272
Publication Date:   14 March 2018
Audience:   General/trade ,  College/higher education ,  Professional and scholarly ,  General ,  Tertiary & Higher Education
Format:   Hardback
Publisher's Status:   Active
Availability:   Manufactured on demand   Availability explained
We will order this item for you from a manufactured on demand supplier.

Table of Contents

Reviews

"‘From 1485 to 1603, Ireland drew from the Tudor court myriad schemes embodied in ""reform"" treatises, but this comprehensive examination challenges previous assumptions of Tudor inconsistency. Heffernan (Queen's Univ., Belfast) believes that intentions to extend the Pale (English territory in Ireland) and royal authority at the expense of the Irish lords marked the treatises; however, the means by which this would be accomplished was heavily debated. The acts of Edward Poynings signaled the end of a lengthy period of the crown’s neglect, but the Henrician policy of ""surrender and regrant"" in the wake of the unsuccessful Kildare Rebellion (1534–35) provided the stamp for future ""reform"" treatises. As Heffernan explains, the possession of the Tudor charter provided no security. Regional conquest and the extension of the Pale proceeded by fits and leaps. By mid-century, the forging of a network of garrisons and the implementation of the plantation system allowed further immigration from England, much of it Protestant, which challenged the authority and culture of the Gaelicized constituents of the Pale. The resultant Desmond Rebellions (1569–73; 1579–83), followed by the scorched-earth suppression, led to a plethora of treatises implicating militarization, but little change in policy. Subjugation and settlement remained the Tudor intent.’ S. L. Smith, California State University, Fullerton, Choice Summing Up: Recommended. Advanced undergraduates through faculty and professionals -- ."


'From 1485 to 1603, Ireland drew from the Tudor court myriad schemes embodied in reform treatises, but this comprehensive examination challenges previous assumptions of Tudor inconsistency. Heffernan (Queen's Univ., Belfast) believes that intentions to extend the Pale (English territory in Ireland) and royal authority at the expense of the Irish lords marked the treatises; however, the means by which this would be accomplished was heavily debated. The acts of Edward Poynings signaled the end of a lengthy period of the crown's neglect, but the Henrician policy of surrender and regrant in the wake of the unsuccessful Kildare Rebellion (1534-35) provided the stamp for future reform treatises. As Heffernan explains, the possession of the Tudor charter provided no security. Regional conquest and the extension of the Pale proceeded by fits and leaps. By mid-century, the forging of a network of garrisons and the implementation of the plantation system allowed further immigration from England, much of it Protestant, which challenged the authority and culture of the Gaelicized constituents of the Pale. The resultant Desmond Rebellions (1569-73; 1579-83), followed by the scorched-earth suppression, led to a plethora of treatises implicating militarization, but little change in policy. Subjugation and settlement remained the Tudor intent.' S. L. Smith, California State University, Fullerton, Choice Summing Up: Recommended. Advanced undergraduates through faculty and professionals -- .


‘From 1485 to 1603, Ireland drew from the Tudor court myriad schemes embodied in ""reform"" treatises, but this comprehensive examination challenges previous assumptions of Tudor inconsistency. Heffernan (Queen's Univ., Belfast) believes that intentions to extend the Pale (English territory in Ireland) and royal authority at the expense of the Irish lords marked the treatises; however, the means by which this would be accomplished was heavily debated. The acts of Edward Poynings signaled the end of a lengthy period of the crown’s neglect, but the Henrician policy of ""surrender and regrant"" in the wake of the unsuccessful Kildare Rebellion (1534–35) provided the stamp for future ""reform"" treatises. As Heffernan explains, the possession of the Tudor charter provided no security. Regional conquest and the extension of the Pale proceeded by fits and leaps. By mid-century, the forging of a network of garrisons and the implementation of the plantation system allowed further immigration from England, much of it Protestant, which challenged the authority and culture of the Gaelicized constituents of the Pale. The resultant Desmond Rebellions (1569–73; 1579–83), followed by the scorched-earth suppression, led to a plethora of treatises implicating militarization, but little change in policy. Subjugation and settlement remained the Tudor intent.’ S. L. Smith, California State University, Fullerton, Choice Summing Up: Recommended. Advanced undergraduates through faculty and professionals -- .


Author Information

David Heffernan is an R. J. Hunter Postdoctoral Research Fellow at Queen's University, Belfast

Tab Content 6

Author Website:  

Countries Available

All regions
Latest Reading Guide

April RG 26_2

 

Shopping Cart
Your cart is empty
Shopping cart
Mailing List