|
![]() |
|||
|
||||
OverviewExposing ethical dilemmas of neuroscientific research on violence, this book warns against a dystopian future in which behavior is narrowly defined in relation to our biological makeup. Biological explanations for violence have existed for centuries, as has criticism of this kind of deterministic science, haunted by a long history of horrific abuse. Yet, this program has endured because of, and not despite, its notorious legacy. Today's scientists are well beyond the nature versus nurture debate. Instead, they contend that scientific progress has led to a nature and nurture, biological and social, stance that allows it to avoid the pitfalls of the past. In Conviction Oliver Rollins cautions against this optimism, arguing that the way these categories are imagined belies a dangerous continuity between past and present. The late 1980s ushered in a wave of techno-scientific advancements in the genetic and brain sciences. Rollins focuses on an often-ignored strand of research, the neuroscience of violence, which he argues became a key player in the larger conversation about the biological origins of criminal, violent behavior. Using powerful technologies, neuroscientists have rationalized an idea of the violent brain-or a brain that bears the marks of predisposition toward ""dangerousness."" Drawing on extensive analysis of neurobiological research, interviews with neuroscientists, and participant observation, Rollins finds that this construct of the brain is ill-equipped to deal with the complexities and contradictions of the social world, much less the ethical implications of informing treatment based on such simplified definitions. Rollins warns of the potentially devastating effects of a science that promises to ""predict"" criminals before the crime is committed, in a world that already understands violence largely through a politic of inequality. Full Product DetailsAuthor: Oliver RollinsPublisher: Stanford University Press Imprint: Stanford University Press Edition: New edition ISBN: 9781503607019ISBN 10: 1503607011 Pages: 277 Publication Date: 13 July 2021 Audience: Professional and scholarly , Professional & Vocational Format: Hardback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: In Print ![]() This item will be ordered in for you from one of our suppliers. Upon receipt, we will promptly dispatch it out to you. For in store availability, please contact us. Table of Contents1. Biology, Violence, and the Continued Debate 2. Finding the ""Fit"" 3. ""Picturing"" Risky Brains 4. Beyond Determinism? 5. The Taboo of Race 6. Fixing Violent Brains 7. The Limits of Scientific ConvictionReviewsWith the emergence of fMRI technology in the 1990s, neuroscientists have attempted to explain violent behavior by locating specific brainwave activity. However, because of the fluidity of the boundaries that define violence, it has been a bumpy road. With Conviction, Oliver Rollins has made a significant contribution to explaining why the path has been so fraught-providing a 'sociology of knowledge' construction that illuminates how the scaffolding of key concepts have come into play, and as often, into conflict. -- Troy Duster, Chancellor's Professor Emeritus * University of California, Berkeley * Oliver Rollins brilliantly probes claims by contemporary neuroscientists that brain science can investigate racist behavior divorced from bio-criminology's past promotion of biological determinism and racist stereotypes. He incisively exposes the social assumptions embedded in the new neuroscientific model of violence-the violent brain -- and shows how researchers' attempts to ignore race actually help to perpetuate racist myths about potential criminals. <i>Conviction</i> makes an essential contribution to our understanding of the promises and pitfalls of biosocial science. -Dorothy Roberts * author of <i>Fatal Invention</i> * Author InformationOliver Rollins is Assistant Professor of American Ethnic Studies at the University of Washington. Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |