Overview

Emphasizes the role history and historical narratives play in constitutional adjudication. Uitz provocatively draws attention to the often-tense relationship between the constitution and historical precedence highlighting the interpretive and normative nature of the law. Her work seeks to understand the conditions under which references to the past, history and traditions are attractive to lawyers, even when they have the potential of perpetuating indeterminacy in constitutional reasoning. Uitz conclusively argues that this constitutional indeterminacy is obscured by 'judicial rhetorical toolkits' of continuity and reconciliation that allow the court's reliance on the past to be unaccounted for. Uitz' rigorous analysis and extensive research makes this work an asset to legal scholars and practitioners alike.

Full Product Details

Author:   Renata Uitz
Publisher:   Central European University Press
Imprint:   Central European University Press
Dimensions:   Width: 15.50cm , Height: 2.00cm , Length: 22.90cm
Weight:   0.531kg
ISBN:  

9789637326325

ISBN 10:   9637326324
Pages:   360
Publication Date:   30 August 2005
Audience:   College/higher education ,  Professional and scholarly ,  Postgraduate, Research & Scholarly ,  Professional & Vocational
Format:   Paperback
Publisher's Status:   Active
Availability:   Awaiting stock  
The supplier is currently out of stock of this item. It will be ordered for you and placed on backorder. Once it does come back in stock, we will ship it out for you.

Table of Contents

Preface and Acknowledgements INTRODUCTION Constitutional Adjudication Haunted by Indeterminacy CHAPTER ONE Historical Narratives in Constitutional Reasoning: Intuitions and Myths Revisited 1.1. History and tradition as accounts of the past: the need for a better distinction, or time to adopt a (not so) new methodology? 1.2. Common-law reasoning, Edmund Burke, and conservative/liberal ideals 1.3. Conclusion: towards a better understanding of historical narratives CHAPTER TWO An Overview of Arguments Used in Constitutional Adjudication 2.1. The limits of textualism in constitutional reasoning 2.2. Courts reaching beyond the text: means of construction outside the constitutional text 2.3. Arguments from context: the trace of the past, history, and traditions in constitutional cases 2.4. Conclusion: variety and recurring traits in constitutional argument CHAPTER THREE The Constitutional Text in the Light of History 3.1. Constitutions on their pasts; courts on the past of their constitutions 3.2. One Pole: the constitutional text calling for an inquiry into history 3.3. The middle of the continuum: a brief overview 3.4. The other pole: history as constitutional text in the Québec secession reference 3.5. Summary of findings: towards disenchantment CHAPTER FOUR Behind Historical Narratives: The Promise of Continuity 4.1. On the vices and virtues of continuity in constitutional adjudication 4.2. Constructing constitutional continuity from the building blocks of preferred pasts 4.3. Seeing continuity and making it make a difference: lessons from transitional justice jurisprudence 4.4. Conclusion without closure: deceived by continuity in constitutional reasoning CHAPTER FIVE The Fruits of Reconciliation: A Bittersweet Harvest 5.1. The many faces of reconciliation and their many implications 5.2. Canada: continuity and reconciliation rhetoric hand in hand 5.3. Reconciliation winning over continuity in Hungarian transitional justice jurisprudence 5.4. Indigenous people in the maze of reconciliation: the suppressed subject revisited 5.5. Conclusion: the unfulfilled promise of reconciliation CONCLUSION Bibliography Index

Reviews

Author Information

Renáta Uitz is Assistant Professor of Comparative Constitutional Law in the Legal Studies Department at Central European University.

Tab Content 6

Author Website:  

Customer Reviews

Recent Reviews

No review item found!

Add your own review!

Countries Available

All regions