|
![]() |
|||
|
||||
OverviewHere, Philip Bobbitt studies the basis for the legitimacy of judicial review by examining six types of constitutional argument--historical, textual, structural, prudential doctrinal, and ethical--through the unusual method of contrasting sketches of prominent legal figures responding to the constitutional crises of their day. Full Product DetailsAuthor: Philip Bobbitt (, University of Texas, Austin)Publisher: Oxford University Press Inc Imprint: Oxford University Press Inc Dimensions: Width: 20.30cm , Height: 1.80cm , Length: 13.70cm Weight: 0.390kg ISBN: 9780195034226ISBN 10: 0195034228 Pages: 304 Publication Date: 08 December 1994 Audience: College/higher education , Professional and scholarly , Undergraduate , Postgraduate, Research & Scholarly Format: Paperback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: To order ![]() Stock availability from the supplier is unknown. We will order it for you and ship this item to you once it is received by us. Table of ContentsReviews<br> Extraordinary. This is the outstanding recent work treating Constitutional Law in terms of the legitimating effects of argumentation. It ranks among the most original and impressive works of American jurisprudence to appear during the decade. <br>--Paul Mattson, University of California, Santa Barbara<p><br> A subtle examination of the legitimacy of judicial review. Constitutional Fate is an exceptional work. A strong reminder that judicial review, properly undertaken, can serve a variety of functions and guarantee a variety of interests in modern society. <br>--Yale Law Journal<p><br> An erudite and cogent presentation. Adds a dimension that significantly enriches one's understanding both of judicial review and of much recent academic discussion surrounding it. <br>--American Political Science Review<p><br> Author InformationTab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |