|
![]() |
|||
|
||||
OverviewFull Product DetailsAuthor: Po Jen Yap (Associate Professor, Associate Professor, The University of Hong Kong)Publisher: Oxford University Press Imprint: Oxford University Press Dimensions: Width: 16.30cm , Height: 2.30cm , Length: 24.10cm Weight: 0.554kg ISBN: 9780198736370ISBN 10: 0198736371 Pages: 266 Publication Date: 16 July 2015 Audience: College/higher education , Professional and scholarly , Tertiary & Higher Education , Professional & Vocational Format: Hardback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: To order ![]() Stock availability from the supplier is unknown. We will order it for you and ship this item to you once it is received by us. Table of Contents1: Introduction 2: Defending Dialogue 3: Overview of the Constitutional Systems 4: Judicial Crises 5: Dialogue and Sub-constitutional Doctrines 6: Freedom of Expression 7: Freedom of Religion 8: Right to Equality 9: Right to Due Process 10: ConclusionReviews` Constitutional Dialogue in Common Law Asia deserves a place on the shelves of every lawyer who thinks about public law in common law Asia. ' Christopher Forsyth, Professor of Public Law and Private International Law, University of Cambridge ` Po Jen Yap's beautifully written book expands the debate on newer, weaker modes of judicial review in at least three important dimensions: geographically, into common law Asia; politically, into dominant ruling party systems; and methodologically, by adding to the range of applicable judicial techniques. A major achievement. ' Stephen Gardbaum, MacArthur Foundation Professor of International Justice and Human Rights, UCLA ` Smartly argued and written in a lively and candid style, Constitutional Dialogue in Common Law Asia is a pleasure to read. ' David S. Law, Professor of Law and Professor of Political Science, Washington University in St. Louis ` Drawing on a wealth of cases, Dr Yap lucidly explains how the invocation of dialogic judicial review can reshape the constitutional landscape in common law Asia. This impressive work will engender controversy and debates among constitutional scholars and jurists. ' HP Lee, Emeritus Professor, Monash University ` Po Jen Yap's examination of constitutional review in three Asian jurisdictions is an important expansion of our understanding, not only because it extends the discussion of forms of constitutional review to previously understudied jurisdictions but also because its examination shows how sub-constitutional review can do much of what dialogic or weak-form constitutional review does. This is an important contribution. ' Mark Tushnet, William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Law, Harvard University Constitutional Dialogue in Common Law Asia deserves a place on the shelves of every lawyer who thinks about public law in common law Asia. Christopher Forsyth, Professor of Public Law and Private International Law, University of Cambridge Po Jen Yap's beautifully written book expands the debate on newer, weaker modes of judicial review in at least three important dimensions: geographically, into common law Asia; politically, into dominant ruling party systems; and methodologically, by adding to the range of applicable judicial techniques. A major achievement. Stephen Gardbaum, MacArthur Foundation Professor of International Justice and Human Rights, UCLA Smartly argued and written in a lively and candid style, Constitutional Dialogue in Common Law Asia is a pleasure to read. David S. Law, Professor of Law and Professor of Political Science, Washington University in St. Louis Drawing on a wealth of cases, Dr Yap lucidly explains how the invocation of dialogic judicial review can reshape the constitutional landscape in common law Asia. This impressive work will engender controversy and debates among constitutional scholars and jurists. HP Lee, Emeritus Professor, Monash University Po Jen Yap's examination of constitutional review in three Asian jurisdictions is an important expansion of our understanding, not only because it extends the discussion of forms of constitutional review to previously understudied jurisdictions but also because its examination shows how sub-constitutional review can do much of what dialogic or weak-form constitutional review does. This is an important contribution. Mark Tushnet, William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Law, Harvard University Author InformationDr Po Jen Yap is an Associate Professor at The University of Hong Kong, Faculty of Law, where he specializes in Constitutional and Administrative law. He graduated from the National University of Singapore with an LLB degree and he obtained LLM qualifications from both Harvard Law School and University College London. He also has a PhD degree from the University of Cambridge. He is an Advocate and Solicitor of the Supreme Court of Singapore and an Attorney at Law in the State of New York (USA). Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |