Overview

Full Product Details

9780198704102

Table of Contents

Reviews

The 32-page bibliography and hundreds of footnotes testify to the book's scholarship ... Summing up: Recommended * CHOICE * One antonym for the common (not much, if at all, mentioned by Rhodes) is the 'rare'. This is a book of rare distinction - in its width of reading, its scale of ambition, its Empsonianly extended apprehension of the English language. If only books this good were more common. * Robert Stagg, Renaissance Studies * No summary or paraphrase could fully capture the experience of reading this ambitious, exhaustively researched book. * Jenny C Mann, The Review of English Studies * This is an erudite and absorbing book. Rhodes has rewritten big portions of arguments about the development of early modern literary history in England, which makes his book indispensable for further scholarly exploration of this period * Goran Stanivukovic, Renaissance and Reformation / Renaissance et Reforme * Common is a richly illustrated argument, and a welcome contribution to the great debate on early modern STEM, Should Teaching English Matter? * Esther Osorio Whewell, Cambridge Quarterly * No such summary can do justice to the ambitious, encyclopedic scope of Rhodes's erudite study. Common brings together topics, texts, and authors often discussed independently of each other, constructing a vast assemblage that produces not only countless local insights but also a coherent general picture of the sixteenth century [] Rhodes's study is smart, ambitious, and essential. It will undoubtedly reshape, for years to come, our conception of the sixteenth century in England. * Corey McEleney, Renaissance Quarterly *

The 32-page bibliography and hundreds of footnotes testify to the book's scholarship ... Summing up: Recommended * CHOICE * One antonym for the common (not much, if at all, mentioned by Rhodes) is the 'rare'. This is a book of rare distinction - in its width of reading, its scale of ambition, its Empsonianly extended apprehension of the English language. If only books this good were more common. * Robert Stagg, Renaissance Studies *

"[...] this is an extraordinary study. Without denying or side-lining the social and economic dimensions, Rhodes sets out to tell a distinctively literary story about Tudor English culture. He covers an enormous range of materials from disparate periods, yet rarely sounds like anything but an expert. [...] his treatment of it will resonate with the impression of many literary critics that something special happened in the final decades of the sixteenth century. * Beth Quitslund, the Spenser Review * As humanities scholars scurry to complete monographs at a speed that satisfies the demands of tenure and promotion, it has become sadly rare to produce scholarly books with a magisterial vista that engages a broad expanse of readers. Neil Rhodes's Common is an admirable exception to this trend. [It] is the kind of book that can only be produced after decades of immersive study in an academic field. It is a genuine accomplishment, not the least for its own elegant rhapsody, stitching together ""popular"" and neglected works of literature with uncontested classics, thus modeling the story it tells by attending to the ways that canonical works such as Hamlet and Tamburlaine are forged out of many of the same conditions, presuppositions, and debates that produced a Thomas Phaer or a John Lyly. * Jessica Wolfe, Sixteenth Century Journal * This ambitious and wide-ranging book offers nothing less than a new account of English literary culture during the sixteenth century. * Hannah Crawforth, Literature & History * No such summary can do justice to the ambitious, encyclopedic scope of Rhodes's erudite study. Common brings together topics, texts, and authors often discussed independently of each other, constructing a vast assemblage that produces not only countless local insights but also a coherent general picture of the sixteenth century [] Rhodes's study is smart, ambitious, and essential. It will undoubtedly reshape, for years to come, our conception of the sixteenth century in England. * Corey McEleney, Renaissance Quarterly * Common is a richly illustrated argument, and a welcome contribution to the great debate on early modern STEM, Should Teaching English Matter? * Esther Osorio Whewell, Cambridge Quarterly * This is an erudite and absorbing book. Rhodes has rewritten big portions of arguments about the development of early modern literary history in England, which makes his book indispensable for further scholarly exploration of this period * Goran Stanivukovic, Renaissance and Reformation / Renaissance et Reforme * No summary or paraphrase could fully capture the experience of reading this ambitious, exhaustively researched book. * Jenny C Mann, The Review of English Studies * One antonym for the common (not much, if at all, mentioned by Rhodes) is the 'rare'. This is a book of rare distinction — in its width of reading, its scale of ambition, its Empsonianly extended apprehension of the English language. If only books this good were more common. * Robert Stagg, Renaissance Studies * The 32-page bibliography and hundreds of footnotes testify to the book's scholarship ... Summing up: Recommended * CHOICE *"

[...] this is an extraordinary study. Without denying or side-lining the social and economic dimensions, Rhodes sets out to tell a distinctively literary story about Tudor English culture. He covers an enormous range of materials from disparate periods, yet rarely sounds like anything but an expert. [...] his treatment of it will resonate with the impression of many literary critics that something special happened in the final decades of the sixteenth century. * Beth Quitslund, the Spenser Review * As humanities scholars scurry to complete monographs at a speed that satisfies the demands of tenure and promotion, it has become sadly rare to produce scholarly books with a magisterial vista that engages a broad expanse of readers. Neil Rhodes's Common is an admirable exception to this trend. [It] is the kind of book that can only be produced after decades of immersive study in an academic field. It is a genuine accomplishment, not the least for its own elegant rhapsody, stitching together popular and neglected works of literature with uncontested classics, thus modeling the story it tells by attending to the ways that canonical works such as Hamlet and Tamburlaine are forged out of many of the same conditions, presuppositions, and debates that produced a Thomas Phaer or a John Lyly. * Jessica Wolfe, Sixteenth Century Journal * This ambitious and wide-ranging book offers nothing less than a new account of English literary culture during the sixteenth century. * Hannah Crawforth, Literature & History * No such summary can do justice to the ambitious, encyclopedic scope of Rhodes's erudite study. Common brings together topics, texts, and authors often discussed independently of each other, constructing a vast assemblage that produces not only countless local insights but also a coherent general picture of the sixteenth century [] Rhodes's study is smart, ambitious, and essential. It will undoubtedly reshape, for years to come, our conception of the sixteenth century in England. * Corey McEleney, Renaissance Quarterly * Common is a richly illustrated argument, and a welcome contribution to the great debate on early modern STEM, Should Teaching English Matter? * Esther Osorio Whewell, Cambridge Quarterly * This is an erudite and absorbing book. Rhodes has rewritten big portions of arguments about the development of early modern literary history in England, which makes his book indispensable for further scholarly exploration of this period * Goran Stanivukovic, Renaissance and Reformation / Renaissance et Reforme * No summary or paraphrase could fully capture the experience of reading this ambitious, exhaustively researched book. * Jenny C Mann, The Review of English Studies * One antonym for the common (not much, if at all, mentioned by Rhodes) is the 'rare'. This is a book of rare distinction - in its width of reading, its scale of ambition, its Empsonianly extended apprehension of the English language. If only books this good were more common. * Robert Stagg, Renaissance Studies * The 32-page bibliography and hundreds of footnotes testify to the book's scholarship ... Summing up: Recommended * CHOICE *

The 32-page bibliography and hundreds of footnotes testify to the book's scholarship ... Summing up: Recommended * CHOICE * One antonym for the common (not much, if at all, mentioned by Rhodes) is the 'rare'. This is a book of rare distinction - in its width of reading, its scale of ambition, its Empsonianly extended apprehension of the English language. If only books this good were more common. * Robert Stagg, Renaissance Studies * No summary or paraphrase could fully capture the experience of reading this ambitious, exhaustively researched book. * Jenny C Mann, The Review of English Studies * This is an erudite and absorbing book. Rhodes has rewritten big portions of arguments about the development of early modern literary history in England, which makes his book indispensable for further scholarly exploration of this period * Goran Stanivukovic, Renaissance and Reformation / Renaissance et Reforme * Common is a richly illustrated argument, and a welcome contribution to the great debate on early modern STEM, Should Teaching English Matter? * Esther Osorio Whewell, Cambridge Quarterly * No such summary can do justice to the ambitious, encyclopedic scope of Rhodes's erudite study. Common brings together topics, texts, and authors often discussed independently of each other, constructing a vast assemblage that produces not only countless local insights but also a coherent general picture of the sixteenth century [] Rhodes's study is smart, ambitious, and essential. It will undoubtedly reshape, for years to come, our conception of the sixteenth century in England. * Corey McEleney, Renaissance Quarterly * This ambitious and wide-ranging book offers nothing less than a new account of English literary culture during the sixteenth century. * Hannah Crawforth, Literature & History * As humanities scholars scurry to complete monographs at a speed that satisfies the demands of tenure and promotion, it has become sadly rare to produce scholarly books with a magisterial vista that engages a broad expanse of readers. Neil Rhodes's Common is an admirable exception to this trend. [It] is the kind of book that can only be produced after decades of immersive study in an academic field. It is a genuine accomplishment, not the least for its own elegant rhapsody, stitching together popular and neglected works of literature with uncontested classics, thus modeling the story it tells by attending to the ways that canonical works such as Hamlet and Tamburlaine are forged out of many of the same conditions, presuppositions, and debates that produced a Thomas Phaer or a John Lyly. * Jessica Wolfe, Sixteenth Century Journal *

The 32-page bibliography and hundreds of footnotes testify to the book's scholarship ... Summing up: Recommended * CHOICE *

Author Information

Neil Rhodes was a Scholar of St Catherine's College, Oxford, where he won the Newdigate prize. His publications include English Renaissance Translation Theory (2013), Shakespeare and the Origins of English (2004) and, with Jonathan Sawday, The Renaissance Computer: Knowledge Technology in the First Age of Print (2000). His first book, Elizabethan Grotesque (1980), was reissued in 2015. He is co-General Editor with Andrew Hadfield of the MHRA Tudor and Stuart Translations and is a visiting professor at the University of Granada and Liverpool Hope University. He is Professor of English Literature and Cultural History at the University of St Andrews.

Tab Content 6

Customer Reviews

Recent Reviews

Countries Available