|
|
|||
|
||||
OverviewThis book addresses the venerable and vexing issues surrounding the problem of whether death can be a harm to the person who dies. This problem is an ancient one which was raised long ago by the early Greek philosopher Epicurus, who notoriously argued that death is at no time a harm to its 'victim' because before death there is no harm and after death there is no victim. Epicurus' conclusion is conspicuously at odds with our pre-reflective -- and in most cases our post-reflective -- intuitions, and numerous strategies have therefore been proposed to refute or avoid it. How then are we to account for our intuition that death is not just an evil, but perhaps the worst evil that may befall us? This is the key issue that the author addresses. This book explores various alternative approaches to the puzzling issues surrounding Epicurus' notorious argument and provides a defence of the intuitively plausible conclusion that death can indeed be a harm to the person who dies. This challenge to Epicurus' argument is developed by way of a detailed exploration of the issues raised not only by Epicurus, but also by his many successors, who have responded variously to the challenging issues which Epicurus raised. This book is a valuable contribution to, and continuation of, a debate which has stimulated philosophical reflection for millennia.Dr. William Grey Full Product DetailsAuthor: J. LiPublisher: Springer Imprint: Springer Edition: Softcover reprint of hardcover 1st ed. 2002 Volume: 73 Dimensions: Width: 15.20cm , Height: 1.10cm , Length: 22.90cm Weight: 0.322kg ISBN: 9789048159734ISBN 10: 9048159733 Pages: 198 Publication Date: 06 December 2010 Audience: Professional and scholarly , Professional & Vocational Format: Paperback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: In Print This item will be ordered in for you from one of our suppliers. Upon receipt, we will promptly dispatch it out to you. For in store availability, please contact us. Table of Contents1. The Epicurean Argument.- 2. The Desire-thwarting Theory.- 3. The Deprivation Theory.- 4. The Interest-Impairment Theory.- 5. The Lucretian Symmetry Argument.- Conclusion.- Notes.ReviewsAuthor InformationTab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |
||||