Overview

"On December 12th, 2000, a controversial decision by the Supreme Court of the United States effectively ended a disputed presidential contest between George W. bush and Albert Gore Jr, with a 5-4 ruling that revealed the court to be as bitterly divided as the electorate. Four days earlier, the Florida Supreme Court had abruptly and dramatically changed the dynamics of the election by reversing a lower court and ordering hand recounts of ""undervotes"" statewide. The US Supreme court quickly stepped in to halt the recounts and agreed to hear Bush v. Gore. After brief oral arguments and a short period of deliberation, the high court reversed the state court decision. The justices in both cases were bittely divided, and passionate language emerged in both the majority rulings and the dissents. The drama and divisiveness of this extraordinary saga come to life in the rulings, opinions, and dissents from these two cases: US Supreme Court case 00-949 (Bush v. Gore) and Florida Supreme Court case 00-2431 (Gore v. Harris). The first section of the volume gathers the complete text of both rulings together. The second section of the book gathers the most significant contemporaneous opinion pieces from journalists and scholars on both sides of the political fence. Selected and organized by political analysts, E.J. Dionne and William Kristol, these articles illuminate the perspectives of both sides about the various twists and turns in the post-election campaign, and the landmark judicial intevention. A companion website provides links to documents from additional legal proceedings and other rleated documents and writings. The legal and historical significance of the 2000 election will be studied and debated for years to come. This volume combines the most important source documents with the most intelligent opinion and analysis about the conflict and its controversial resolution."

Full Product Details

9780815701071

Table of Contents

Reviews

"""A 'must' for students of political science and American electorial history."" — Midwest Book Review, 4/18/2001 |""Kristol and Dionne's collection stand[s] up well as an account of the 'outside story' in Florida."" —Richard Lowry, National Review, 4/19/2001 |""'Bush v. Gore' is essential reading.... It features a wide range of intelligent commentary, from hard-hitting leftist critiques in The Nation, to confused centrist plaints in The New Republic, to jarring conservative responses in The Weekly Standard."" —Corey Robin, Brooklyn College, SUNY, Newsday, 6/20/2001 |""The editors, who differ on recount questions, have been careful to balance opinions in their column selections."" —Robert Nardini, Library Journal, 9/24/2001 |""... makes for entertaining and informative reading to see such contrasts in opinion."" —Kenneth R. Mayer, Congress & the Presidency, 10/1/2001 |""Bush v. Gore [is] a well-edited, balanced work.... The book collects the principal decisions and varied and thought-provoking views on the main facets of the battle."" —Steven I. Himelstein, Dorsey & Whitney LLP (Law firm), New York Law Journal, 5/4/2001"

A 'must' for students of political science and American electorial history. -- Midwest Book Review, 4/18/2001 Kristol and Dionne's collection stand[s] up well as an account of the 'outside story' in Florida. --Richard Lowry, National Review, 4/19/2001 'Bush v. Gore' is essential reading... It features a wide range of intelligent commentary, from hard-hitting leftist critiques in The Nation, to confused centrist plaints in The New Republic, to jarring conservative responses in The Weekly Standard. --Corey Robin, Brooklyn College, SUNY, Newsday, 6/20/2001 The editors, who differ on recount questions, have been careful to balance opinions in their column selections. --Robert Nardini, Library Journal, 9/24/2001 ... makes for entertaining and informative reading to see such contrasts in opinion. --Kenneth R. Mayer, Congress & the Presidency, 10/1/2001 Bush v. Gore [is] a well-edited, balanced work... The book collects the principal decisions and varied and thought-provoking views on the main facets of the battle. --Steven I. Himelstein, Dorsey & Whitney LLP (Law firm), New York Law Journal, 5/4/2001

Author Information

E.J. Dionne Jr. is a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, cochair of the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life, and a syndicated columnist for the Washington Post Writers Group. William Kristol is editor and publisher of The Weekly Standard.

Tab Content 6

Customer Reviews

Recent Reviews

Countries Available