|
![]() |
|||
|
||||
OverviewFull Product DetailsAuthor: Elisa Kriza , Andreas Umland , Andrei RogatchevskiPublisher: ibidem-Verlag, Jessica Haunschild u Christian Schon Imprint: ibidem-Verlag, Jessica Haunschild u Christian Schon Volume: 131 Dimensions: Width: 14.80cm , Height: 1.50cm , Length: 21.00cm Weight: 0.427kg ISBN: 9783838206905ISBN 10: 3838206908 Pages: 310 Publication Date: 01 September 2014 Audience: College/higher education , Postgraduate, Research & Scholarly Format: Hardback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: In Print ![]() This item will be ordered in for you from one of our suppliers. Upon receipt, we will promptly dispatch it out to you. For in store availability, please contact us. Language: English Table of ContentsForeword, by Andrei Rogatchevski Acknowledgements 1. Introduction 2. Solzhenitsyn as a Writer and a Witness 3. Solzhenitsyn's Oeuvre between Aesthetics and Politics 4. Solzhenitsyn in History Conclusions BibliographyReviewsThis book shows a solid and comprehensive grasp of Solzhenitsyn's work and the huge body of criticism it has fostered. The comparative and interdisciplinary approach is organically embedded in the chapters' detailed readings and documents Kriza's capacity to master a differentiated use of vast material. -- Svend-Erik Larsen, Aarhus University Revising by nature, Elisa Kriza's study re-examines selected principal tendencies of Solzhenitsyn's reception in the Anglophone and German-speaking world since the 1960s, and contextualizes his oeuvre within the framework of witness literature and representations of confinement. The main (and timely) question she posits is: Political factors notwithstanding, should Solzhenitsyn still be read in the West today--and if yes, why and how? -- Andrei Rogatchevski, University of Tromso, Norway The merits of this book are several and decisive. First of all it shows a solid and comprehensive grasp of Solzhenitsyn's work in its entirety and the huge body of criticism it has fostered, from books to articles and from political statements to reviews and debates in various media. Second, the ambition of making a reception study that redefines the field and, at the same time, exemplifies it through an investigation of a vast and complex material is innovative and represents a real scholarly achievement. Third, the comparative and interdisciplinary approach is organically embedded in the chapters in their detailed readings, and documents Elisa Kriza's capacity to master a differentiated use of the vast material. -- Svend-Erik Larsen, Professor of Comparative Literature, Aarhus University Revising by nature, Elisa Kriza's study re-examines selected principal tendencies of Solzhenitsyn's reception in the Anglophone and German-speaking world since the 1960s, and contextualizes his oeuvre within the framework of witness literature and representations of confinement. The main (and timely) question she posits is: Political factors notwithstanding, should Solzhenitsyn still be read in the West todayand if yes, why and how? -- Andrei Rogatchevski, Professor of Russian Literature and Culture, University of Tromso, Norway The merits of this book are several and decisive. First of all it shows a solid and comprehensive grasp of Solzhenitsyn's work in its entirety and the huge body of criticism it has fostered, from books to articles and from political statements to reviews and debates in various media. Second, the ambition of making a reception study that redefines the field and, at the same time, exemplifies it through an investigation of a vast and complex material is innovative and represents a real scholarly achievement. Third, the comparative and interdisciplinary approach is organically embedded in the chapters in their detailed readings, and documents Elisa Kriza's capacity to master a differentiated use of the vast material. -Svend-Erik Larsen, Professor of Comparative Literature, Aarhus University Revising by nature, Elisa Kriza's study re-examines selected principal tendencies of Solzhenitsyn's reception in the Anglophone and German-speaking world since the 1960s, and contextualizes his oeuvre within the framework of witness literature and representations of confinement. The main (and timely) question she posits is: Political factors notwithstanding, should Solzhenitsyn still be read in the West today -- and if yes, why and how? -Andrei Rogatchevski, Professor of Russian Literature and Culture, University of Tromso, Norway Author InformationElisa Kriza, PhD, Aarhus University, Denmark, has previously taught courses on dissident and émigré literature and on cultural encounters and conflicts. Her research focus lies on the interrelations of cultural output in international contexts Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |