|
![]() |
|||
|
||||
OverviewUsing newly released documents, the author presents an integrated look at American nuclear policy and diplomacy in crises from the Berlin blockade to Vietnam. The book answers the question why, when the atomic bomb had been used with such devastating effect against the Japanese Empire in 1945, American leaders put this most apocalyptic of weapons back on the shelf, never to be used again in anger. It documents the myopia of Potomac strategists in involving the U.S. in wars of attrition in Korea and Southeast Asia, marginal areas where American vital interests were in no way endangered. Despite the presence of hundreds, then thousands of nuclear bombs and warheads in the nation's stockpile, the greatest military weapon in history became politically impossible to use. And yet overwhelming nuclear superiority did serve its ultimate purpose in the Cold War. When American vital interests were threatened—over Berlin and Cuba—the Soviets backed down from confrontation. Despite errors in strategic judgment brought on by fear of Communist expansion, and in some cases outright incompetence, the ace in the hole proved decisive. Full Product DetailsAuthor: Timothy J. BottiPublisher: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc Imprint: Praeger Publishers Inc Volume: No. 165. Dimensions: Width: 15.60cm , Height: 1.90cm , Length: 23.40cm Weight: 0.636kg ISBN: 9780313299766ISBN 10: 0313299765 Pages: 328 Publication Date: 21 June 1996 Recommended Age: From 7 to 17 years Audience: College/higher education , Professional and scholarly , Undergraduate , Postgraduate, Research & Scholarly Format: Hardback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: Manufactured on demand ![]() We will order this item for you from a manufactured on demand supplier. Table of ContentsReviewsIn this highly detailed account, Botti usefully debunks the commonly held notion that nuclear war was held to be unthinkable by presidents and their advisers during crises over the first 20 years of the Cold War (Berlin, Korea, Formosa, and Cuba, among others). He suggests instead that overreaching by threatening or engaging in military action in areas not in the vital interests of the US has posed a major risk in the possible use of such weapons. -Choice ?In this highly detailed account, Botti usefully debunks the commonly held notion that nuclear war was held to be unthinkable by presidents and their advisers during crises over the first 20 years of the Cold War (Berlin, Korea, Formosa, and Cuba, among others). He suggests instead that overreaching by threatening or engaging in military action in areas not in the vital interests of the US has posed a major risk in the possible use of such weapons.?-Choice ?In this highly detailed account, Botti usefully debunks the commonly held notion that nuclear war was held to be unthinkable by presidents and their advisers during crises over the first 20 years of the Cold War (Berlin, Korea, Formosa, and Cuba, among others). He suggests instead that overreaching by threatening or engaging in military action in areas not in the vital interests of the US has posed a major risk in the possible use of such weapons.?-Choice Author InformationTIMOTHY J. BOTTI is an unaffiliated historian who is the author of The Long Wait: Forging of the Anglo-American Nuclear Alliance, 1945-1958 (Greenwood, 1987). Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |