Overview

The United States Supreme Court's 2002-03 term confounded Court watchers. The same Rhenquist Court that many had seen as solidly conservative and unduly activist - the Court that had decided the 2000 presidential election and struck down 31 federal statutes since 1995 - issued a set of surprising, watershed rulings. In a term filled with important and unpredictable decisions, it upheld affirmative action, invalidated a same-sex sodomy statute, and reversed a death sentence due to ineffective assistance of counsel. With essays focused on individual Justices, Court practices, and some of last year's most important rulings, this volume explores the meaning and significance of the Court's 2002-03 term. Seasoned Supreme Court advocates and journalists from The New York Times, The New Republic, The Los Angeles Times, the National Journal, Slate, Legal Times, and Newsweek grapple with questions about the Rehnquist Court's identity and the Supreme Court's role in the political life of the country. Some essays consider the role of ""swing"" Justices Sandra Day O'Connor and Anthony Kennedy within a Court that divides 5-4 more than any other group of Justices in the nation's history. Others examine the political reaction to and legal context of the Court's Lawrence v. Texas decision declaring a Texas law criminalizing homosexual sodomy unconstitutional. Contributors analyze the Court's rulings on affirmative action and reassess its commitment to states' rights. Considering the Court's practices, one essayist explores the use and utility of amicus curae, or ""friend of the court"" briefs, while another reflects on indications of an increased openness by the Court to public scrutiny. Two advocates who argued cases before the Court last year - one related to hate speech and the other to a ""three strikes and you're out"" criminal statute - offer vivid accounts of their experiences. Intended for general readers, A Year at the Supreme Court is for all those who want to understand the Rehnquist Court and its momentous 2002-03 term.

Full Product Details

9780822334484

Table of Contents

Reviews

The editors, who provide useful introductions to each chapter, should be applauded for adding this splendid volume to Duke's 'Constitutional Conflicts' series. Highly recommended. <br>--P. Watkins, Choice

"""'The quiet of a storm center,' Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. said of the Supreme Court. The storm--the drama--has never been more intense than in the 2002-03 term. Here the decisions of that term are brilliantly, provocatively described and analyzed.""--Anthony Lewis, author of Gideon's Trumpet and Make No Law ""A close and revealing look by journalists and advocates on the operations of the Supreme Court. This book captures the powerful political pressures that constantly play against the Justices and help determine their decisions.""--Louis Fisher, author of American Constitutional Law"

Author Information

Neal Devins is Goodrich Professor of Law and Director of the Institute of Bill of Rights Law at the William and Mary School of Law. He is also Professor of Government at the College of William and Mary. His most recent books include The Democratic Constitution and Political Dynamics of Constitutional Law (4th edition), both coauthored with Louis Fisher. Davison M. Douglas is the Arthur B. Hanson Professor of Law at the William and Mary School of Law, where he is former Director of the Institute of Bill of Rights Law. He is the author of Reading, Writing, and Race: The Desegregation of the Charlotte Schools.

Tab Content 6

Customer Reviews

Recent Reviews

Countries Available