|
![]() |
|||
|
||||
OverviewThis SpringerBrief proposes a general framework for reasoning about inconsistency in a wide variety of logics, including inconsistency resolution methods that have not yet been studied. The proposed framework allows users to specify preferences on how to resolve inconsistency when there are multiple ways to do so. This empowers users to resolve inconsistency in data leveraging both their detailed knowledge of the data as well as their application needs. The brief shows that the framework is well-suited to handle inconsistency in several logics, and provides algorithms to compute preferred options. Finally, the brief shows that the framework not only captures several existing works, but also supports reasoning about inconsistency in several logics for which no such methods exist today. Full Product DetailsAuthor: Maria Vanina Martinez , Cristian Molinaro , V.S. Subrahmanian , Leila AmgoudPublisher: Springer-Verlag New York Inc. Imprint: Springer-Verlag New York Inc. Edition: 2013 ed. Dimensions: Width: 15.50cm , Height: 0.20cm , Length: 23.50cm Weight: 1.007kg ISBN: 9781461467496ISBN 10: 1461467497 Pages: 45 Publication Date: 20 March 2013 Audience: Professional and scholarly , Professional & Vocational Format: Paperback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: Manufactured on demand ![]() We will order this item for you from a manufactured on demand supplier. Table of ContentsIntroduction and Preliminary Concepts.- A General Framework for Handling Inconsistency.- Algorithms.- Handling Inconsistency in Monotonic Logics.- Link with Existing Approaches.- Conclusions.ReviewsFrom the reviews: The aim of this book, consisting of six chapters, is to develop a unified framework for reasoning on inconsistency which allows end-users to apply their domain knowledge and subsequently tailor it to their needs. In particular, the framework shall be applicable to any Tarskian logic the end-user employs. (Jurgen Landes, zbMATH, Vol. 1276, 2014) From the reviews: The aim of this book, consisting of six chapters, is to develop a unified framework for reasoning on inconsistency which allows end-users to apply their domain knowledge and subsequently tailor it to their needs. In particular, the framework shall be applicable to any Tarskian logic the end-user employs. (Jurgen Landes, zbMATH, Vol. 1276, 2014) From the reviews: “The aim of this book, consisting of six chapters, is to develop a unified framework for reasoning on inconsistency which allows end-users to apply their domain knowledge and subsequently tailor it to their needs. In particular, the framework shall be applicable to any Tarskian logic the end-user employs.” (Jürgen Landes, zbMATH, Vol. 1276, 2014) Author InformationTab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |