Overview

What holds political order together, and why does it sometimes unravel with such sudden force? This book begins from a simple but unsettling observation: stability is often an illusion sustained by fragile alignments of institutions, norms, and strategic actors. When those alignments shift, even slightly, systems that appeared resilient can enter rapid phases of breakdown. At its core, the argument moves beyond the conventional opposition between democracy and authoritarianism. Instead of treating them as fixed regime types, it approaches political systems as dynamic configurations shaped by continuous contestation, adaptation, and strategic interaction. The familiar language of institutional design or regime classification is therefore insufficient on its own. What matters more is how power is exercised within these structures, how information circulates, and how actors respond under conditions of uncertainty. The book develops this argument by tracing the mechanisms through which political order is constructed and destabilised. Institutions are not neutral containers of power; they are arenas in which actors negotiate, manipulate, and sometimes hollow out the very rules that sustain them. Norms, often assumed to be stabilising forces, can erode gradually without triggering immediate crisis, only to reveal their absence at critical moments. At the same time, external pressures such as technological change, economic shocks, and geopolitical competition introduce new layers of complexity that existing institutional frameworks struggle to absorb. Empirically, the analysis moves across both democratic and authoritarian contexts to show that vulnerability is not confined to any single regime type. Established democracies may experience slow institutional decay through the politicisation of oversight mechanisms, the erosion of trust, and the strategic use of legal instruments to undermine accountability. Authoritarian systems, often perceived as stable due to centralised control, reveal their own fragilities in moments of elite fragmentation, information failure, or sudden shifts in coercive capacity. The comparison is not intended to collapse distinctions between regimes, but to demonstrate that both operate under conditions of strategic uncertainty that can produce unexpected outcomes. A central thread throughout the book is the role of perception. Political actors do not respond to objective conditions alone; they act on interpretations of risk, opportunity, and constraint. Misperceptions, whether deliberate or accidental, can amplify instability. Information environments shaped by digital media intensify this dynamic by accelerating feedback loops and fragmenting shared realities. As a result, crises are not merely events but processes that unfold through interaction, where small decisions accumulate into systemic consequences. The metaphor of the chessboard, which runs implicitly through the analysis, captures this strategic dimension. Political life is not a static arrangement of pieces but an ongoing game in which rules can be reinterpreted, and positions can shift rapidly. Yet unlike a controlled game, the political arena is marked by incomplete information and asymmetrical power, meaning that outcomes are rarely predictable and often irreversible. The result is an account that speaks both to scholarly debates and to a broader audience concerned with the direction of contemporary politics. It invites the reader to reconsider familiar categories and to engage more closely with the processes that define moments of stability and rupture.

Full Product Details

9798195591434

Table of Contents

Reviews

Author Information

Tab Content 6

Countries Available