|
|
|||
|
||||
OverviewThough the digression closing Simplicius’ commentary on Aristotle’s De caelo 2.12 has long been misread as a history of early Greek planetary theory, it is in fact a creative reading of Aristotle to maintain the authority of the De caelo as a sacred text in Late Platonism and to refute the polemic mounted by the Christian, John Philoponus. This book shows that the critical question forced on Simplicius was whether his school’s acceptance of Ptolemy’s planetary hypotheses entailed a rejection of Aristotle’s argument that the heavens are made of a special matter that moves by nature in a circle about the center of the cosmos and, thus, a repudiation of the thesis that the cosmos is uncreated and everlasting. Full Product DetailsAuthor: Alan C. BowenPublisher: Brill Imprint: Brill Volume: 133 Dimensions: Width: 15.50cm , Height: 2.30cm , Length: 23.50cm Weight: 1.520kg ISBN: 9789004227088ISBN 10: 9004227083 Pages: 352 Publication Date: 29 November 2012 Audience: Professional and scholarly , Professional and scholarly , Professional & Vocational , Professional & Vocational Format: Hardback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: Manufactured on demand We will order this item for you from a manufactured on demand supplier. Language: English, Greek, Ancient (to 1453) Table of ContentsPreface Acknowledgments Conventions List of Figures The Argument Introduction 1. The Heresy of Non-Homocentric Aetherial Motion 2. The Heretical Rejection of All Hypotheses 3. Simplicius, the Apologist 4. Simplicius, the Historian 5. Conclusion Translation In de caelo 2.10 The proportionality of the planetary speeds In de caelo 2.11 The sphericity of the wandering stars In de caelo 2.12 The proportionality of the planetary motions Figures Comments In de caelo 2.10 In de caelo 2.11 In de caelo 2.12 Bibliography Index of Passages Passages in I.G. Kidd 1988–1999, vol.1 Index of Names Index of SubjectsReviewsThis book is a careful study of Simplicius In de caelo 2.10-12 in the context of challenges to late-ancient Platonism raised by John Philoponus. It will be valuable to scholars interested in the efforts of the Athenian Platonists to create a synthesis of the thought of Plato, Aristotle and Ptolemy, in the history of ancient Greek astronomy and its sources, and in the historiography of early science. Nathan Sidoli, Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2014.03.62. This book is a careful study of Simplicius' In de caelo 2.10-12 in the context of challenges to late-ancient Platonism raised by John Philoponus. It will be valuable to scholars interested in the efforts of the Athenian Platonists to create a synthesis of the thought of Plato, Aristotle and Ptolemy, in the history of ancient Greek astronomy and its sources, and in the historiography of early science. Nathan Sidoli, Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2014.03.62. Author InformationAlan C. Bowen, Ph.D. (1977) Philosophy, University of Toronto, is Director of the Institute for Research in Classical Philosophy and Science (Princeton). He has numerous publications in the history of science and philosophy, including New Perspectives on Aristotle’s De caelo (with Christian Wildberg). Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |
||||