|
![]() |
|||
|
||||
OverviewIn this text, it is argued that game theory provides a systematic tool for investigating ethical matters. The reinterpretation of classical social contract ideas within a game-theoretic framework generates new insights into the fundamental questions of social philosophy. The author first focuses on foundational issues - paying particular attention to the failings of recent attempts to import game-theoretic ideas into social and political philosophy. The book shows how ideas drawn from the classic expositions of Harsanyi and Rawls produce a synthesis that is consistent with the modern theory of noncooperative games. In the process, the author notes logical weaknesses in other analyses of social cooperation and coordination, such as those offered by Rousseau, Kant, Gauthier, and Nozick. He persuasively argues that much of the current literature elaborates a faulty analysis of an irrelevant game. ""Game Theory and the Social Contract"" makes game-theoretic ideas more widely accessible to those with only a limited knowledge of the field. Instructional material is woven into the narrative, which is illustrated with simple examples, and the mathematical content has been reduced to a minimum. Full Product DetailsAuthor: Ken BinmorePublisher: MIT Press Ltd Imprint: MIT Press Dimensions: Width: 16.00cm , Height: 2.80cm , Length: 22.90cm Weight: 0.771kg ISBN: 9780262023634ISBN 10: 0262023636 Pages: 388 Publication Date: 29 March 1994 Recommended Age: From 18 Audience: Professional and scholarly , Professional & Vocational Format: Hardback Publisher's Status: Out of Print Availability: In Print ![]() Limited stock is available. It will be ordered for you and shipped pending supplier's limited stock. Table of ContentsPart 1 A liberal leviathan: whiggery; deKanting Rawls; Behemoth and the market; elephants and donkeys. Part 2 Toying with tautologies: equilibrium; games and the social contract; my dear sir, clear your mind of Cant!; time and commitment; really meaning it. Part 3 Squaring the circle: transparent disposition fallacies; the symmetry fallacy; paradox of the twins; Newcomb's paradox; paradox of the surprise test. Part 4 Cardinal comparisons: ordinal and cardinal utility; intrapersonal comparison of utility; interpersonal comparison of utility; Kant and the prisoners' dilemma; Bayesian decision theory; Rawlsian maximin; the game of morals.ReviewsAuthor InformationKen Binmore is Emeritus Professor at University College London. A Fellow of the Econometric Society and the British Academy, he is the author of Game Theory and the Social Contract, Volume 1: Playing Fair (1994) and Volume 2: Just Playing (1998), and the coeditor of Frontiers of Game Theory (1993), all three published by The MIT Press. Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |