Overview

This research used uniforms of the United States Navy and Marine Corps to explain the costs and benefits of the services consolidating uniforms and wearing a single functional uniform. This study examined the history of Navy and Marine Corps uniforms. It analyzed benefits and costs, as well as identified impediments to implementing a single functional uniform for use at Contiguous United States (CONUS) and Outside Continental United States (OCONUS) duty stations. The research team concluded that there are many possible benefits to consolidation such as increased concealment, safety, and functionality. After analyzing eight possible courses of action (COA), the research team concluded that COA 4, both the Navy and Marine Corps utilizing the Marine Corps Combat Utility Uniform (MCCUU) Flame Resistant (FR) variant, resulted in the greatest number of benefits and the highest weight of perceived benefits to the warfighter. The distinction between United States Armed Forces uniforms allows service members to immediately possess a strong sense of pride for their selected service. Separate, distinct uniforms also contribute to the uniqueness of each military branch of service and the respective roles each service plays in the defense of the United States of America. Additionally, officers and enlisted have different uniforms to ensure distinction between the different groups of service members. The Navy has a common uniform worn by all called the Navy Working Uniform (NWU) in three variants. The Marine Corps also has a common uniform that comes in two variants called the Marine Corps Combat Utility Uniform (MCCUU). The Marine Corps administratively falls under the Department of the Navy, yet the Navy and Marine Corps each have their own sets of uniforms. The current method for uniform procurement is performed independently by each branch and over the last eighteen years, both services have fielded different combat uniforms to go along with the different utility and dress uniforms. The Fiscal Year 2014 National Defense Authorization Act, Section 352, calls for the elimination of the development and fielding of Armed Force-specific combat and camouflage utility uniforms and families of uniforms in order to adopt and field a common combat and camouflage utility uniform or family of uniforms for specific combat environments to be used by all members of the Armed Forces (National Defense Authorization Act [NDAA], 2014). I. Introduction * A. Problem Statement * B. Research Questions * C. Purpose * D. Organization * Ii. Background * A. Introduction To Camouflage * B. Non-Service Specific Camouflage Uniforms Used By American Forces * 1. Olive Green Shade 107 * 2. Tiger Stripe * 3. Engineer Research And Development Lab * 4. Woodland Camouflage Utility Uniform * 5. Desert Battle Dress Uniform * 6. Desert Camouflage Uniform * C. Usmc Specific Uniforms * 1. Marine Corps Combat Utility Uniforms * 2. Flame Resistant Marine Corps Combat Utility Uniforms * 3. Future Tropical Uniform * D. Usn Specific Uniforms * 1. Navy Working Uniform Type I * 2. Navy Working Uniform Type Ii * 3. Navy Working Uniform Type Iii * 4. Flame Resistant Navy Working Uniforms * 5. Flame Resistant Variant Coveralls And Flight Suits * E. Camouflage In Major League Baseball * F. Summary * Iii. Literature Review * A. Background * 1. Navy Exchange Service Command (Nexcom) * 2. Marine Corps Systems Command (Marcorsyscom)\ * 3. Naval Facility Engineering Command (Navfac) * 4. U.S. Army Natick Soldier Research, Development & Engineering Center (Nsrdec) * 5. Defense Logistics Agency (Dla) Troop Support Clothing And Textiles * B. Uniform Findings * 1. Marine Corps Combat Utility Uniform * 2. Navy Working Uniform (Nwu) Type I * 3. Navy Working Uniform (Nwu) Type Ii And Type Iii * Iv. Methodology * A. Cost Benefit Analysis Model * 1. History Of Cba

Full Product Details

9781720040170

Table of Contents

Reviews

Author Information

Tab Content 6

Customer Reviews

Recent Reviews

Countries Available