Overview

Russell B. Goodman tells the story of the development of philosophy in America from the mid-18th century to the late 19th century. The key figures in this story, Jonathan Edwards, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, the writers of The Federalist, and the romantics (or 'transcendentalists') Emerson and Thoreau, were not professors but men of the world, whose deep formative influence on American thought brought philosophy together with religion, politics, and literature. Goodman considers their work in relation to the philosophers and other thinkers they found important: the deism of John Toland and Matthew Tindal, the moral sense theories of Francis Hutcheson, Adam Smith, and David Hume, the political and religious philosophy of John Locke, the romanticism of William Wordsworth and Samuel Taylor Coleridge, and the transcendental idealism of Immanuel Kant. Goodman discusses Edwards's condemnation and Franklin's acceptance of deism, argues that Jefferson was an Epicurean in his metaphysical views and a Christian, Stoic, and Epicurean in his moral outlook, traces Emerson's debts to writers from Madame de Staël to William Ellery Channing, and considers Thoreau's orientation to the universe through sitting and walking. The morality of American slavery is a major theme in American Philosophy before Pragmatism, introduced not to excuse or condemn, but to study how five formidably intelligent people thought about the question when it was--as it no longer is for us--open. Edwards, Franklin and Jefferson owned slaves, though Franklin and Jefferson played important roles in disturbing the uneasy American moral equilibrium that included slavery, even as they approved an American constitution that included it. Emerson and Thoreau were prominent public opponents of slavery in the eighteen forties and fifties. The book contains an Interlude on the concept of a republic and concludes with an Epilogue documenting some continuities in American philosophy, particularly between Emerson and the pragmatists.

Full Product Details

9780198801535

Table of Contents

Reviews

This fine introduction to early American philosophy features Edwards prominently . . . [Goodman's] treatment of Edwards now joins the ranks of short surveys by philosophers and historians-John Smith, Morton White, Paul Conkin, William Clebsch, Bruce Kuklick, and others-who interpret him in light of later American philosophy. It deserves a wide reading. * Doug Sweeney, Jonathan Edwards Centre * Goodman's book is required reading. There is much to admire about this relatively short (and therefore extremely ambitious) book: its historical detail, its ability to anticipate and foreshadow later philosophical developments, its attention to the nexus of the political and the philosophical, and a gracious manner of writing that invites the reader into a very accessible story about a strain of American thought. * John Kaag, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews *

Goodman succeeds in linking the varied intellectual debates that occupied his principle figures to their practical implications, both of their own times and of today. His readings as a result are fresh and convincing, though given the brevity of the book, no discussion is as intense as the topics deserve. His presentations relate his figures to concurrent developments in Europe, but they do not demand more than a casual knowledge of the history of philosophy. As an account of how five prominent thinkers in British North America and the United States responded to debates over slavery, the work illuminates the twists and turns involved when ideals and practical interests are in conflict. These strengths will make this a useful book for some courses, particularly if combined with primary readings. * Society for U.S. Intellectual History * This fine introduction to early American philosophy features Edwards prominently . . . [Goodman's] treatment of Edwards now joins the ranks of short surveys by philosophers and historians-John Smith, Morton White, Paul Conkin, William Clebsch, Bruce Kuklick, and others-who interpret him in light of later American philosophy. It deserves a wide reading. * Doug Sweeney, Jonathan Edwards Centre * Goodman's book is required reading. There is much to admire about this relatively short (and therefore extremely ambitious) book: its historical detail, its ability to anticipate and foreshadow later philosophical developments, its attention to the nexus of the political and the philosophical, and a gracious manner of writing that invites the reader into a very accessible story about a strain of American thought. * John Kaag, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews *

Goodman's book is required reading. There is much to admire about this relatively short (and therefore extremely ambitious) book: its historical detail, its ability to anticipate and foreshadow later philosophical developments, its attention to the nexus of the political and the philosophical, and a gracious manner of writing that invites the reader into a very accessible story about a strain of American thought. * John Kaag, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews * This fine introduction to early American philosophy features Edwards prominently . . . [Goodman's] treatment of Edwards now joins the ranks of short surveys by philosophers and historians--John Smith, Morton White, Paul Conkin, William Clebsch, Bruce Kuklick, and others--who interpret him in light of later American philosophy. It deserves a wide reading. * Doug Sweeney, Jonathan Edwards Centre * Goodman succeeds in linking the varied intellectual debates that occupied his principle figures to their practical implications, both of their own times and of today. His readings as a result are fresh and convincing, though given the brevity of the book, no discussion is as intense as the topics deserve. His presentations relate his figures to concurrent developments in Europe, but they do not demand more than a casual knowledge of the history of philosophy. As an account of how five prominent thinkers in British North America and the United States responded to debates over slavery, the work illuminates the twists and turns involved when ideals and practical interests are in conflict. These strengths will make this a useful book for some courses, particularly if combined with primary readings. * Society for U.S. Intellectual History *

Author Information

Russell Goodman is Professor of Philosophy at the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.

Tab Content 6

Customer Reviews

Recent Reviews

Countries Available